Good Feminism vs. Bad Feminism
Adapted from Sex 3.0 by J.J. Roberts, with additional insights by Andre Paradis
Broadly speaking, modern feminism falls into two distinct camps, each based on a very different definition of equality.
Type One Feminism: Equal Worth, Equal Rights
The first definition of equality says this: women are just as important as men and should never be treated as second-class citizens.
This is Type One feminism.
Type One feminism gave rise to historic and necessary movements such as women’s suffrage, where women fought for the right to vote, run for office, work, own property, and achieve financial independence.
These victories were inevitable because they were just.
No authority, whether political, legal, economic, patriarchal, or matriarchal, has legitimacy unless it serves those who submit to it. A society that denies women basic rights fails that test.
In most Western nations, this battle has largely been won. Women today have political rights, access to careers, education, and economic mobility.
In many parts of the world, however, the fight continues. Countries like Saudi Arabia only granted women voting rights in 2015, and even now restrict basic freedoms such as driving, making social mobility nearly impossible without physical mobility.
Wherever women are denied equal rights, Type One feminism remains both necessary and inevitable. Justice always wins in the long run.
Type Two Feminism: Equality as Sameness
The second definition of equality claims that men and women are the same, differing only in minor biological details.
This is Type Two feminism.
Type Two feminism insists that gender roles, behavioral differences, and even biological tendencies are artificial social constructs imposed by men, who are framed as the enemy or oppressor.
This idea collapses under even minimal scrutiny. A single nature documentary dismantles the notion that biology is a social invention.
To maintain this belief, Type Two feminism relies heavily on conformity and shaming. Disagreement is not debated; it is labeled and attacked.
Fog Alert: Misogyny
The word misogyny originally meant hatred of women.
Today, it is often repurposed by Type Two feminists to mean:
“You disagree with us.”
Ironically, the mirror term, misandry, the hatred of men, is frequently displayed within these same circles. Hatred of one sex in the name of equality is not progress; it is hypocrisy.
If men are framed as the enemy, then the real enemy quickly becomes nature itself, because the differences being rejected are biological, not cultural.
Why Type Two Feminism Fails Everyone
Type Two feminism fails women by teaching them to reject femininity, beauty, and softness, the very traits that naturally create attraction, polarity, and connection with men.
It fails men because it demands attraction without allowing the conditions that create attraction.
Most importantly, it fails reality.
This movement operates as a false flag, a term borrowed from military strategy, where blame is deliberately misassigned. Type Two feminism claims that natural, genetic imperatives are inventions of men, when they are not.
There was never a “battle of the sexes.” The real conflict is Type Two feminism versus nature.
The Real Goal of a Healthy Society
Any functional society; patriarchal, matriarchal, or otherwise, must serve both men and women. The aim should always be mutual flourishing, not dominance.
You cannot improve humanity by advancing 50% of the population at the expense of the other 50%. Life is not a zero-sum game.
The subjugation of either sex, whether through patriarchy, matriarchy, radical ideology, or violence, is a failure of civilization.
Type Two feminism is ultimately an attempt to erase gender itself. It breeds resentment, rejects biology, and replaces cooperation with conflict.
That is why it cannot win.
And that is why it should not be allowed to spread any further.
–Andre Paradis